Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A population protocol for exact majority with $O(\log^{5/3} n)$ stabilization time and asymptotically optimal number of states (1805.05157v2)

Published 14 May 2018 in cs.DC

Abstract: A population protocol can be viewed as a sequence of pairwise interactions of $n$ agents (nodes). During one interaction, two agents selected uniformly at random update their states by applying a specified deterministic transition function. In a long run, the whole system should stabilize at the correct output property. The main performance objectives in designing population protocols are small number of states per agent and fast stabilization time. We present a fast population protocol for the exact-majority problem which uses $\Theta(\log n)$ states (per agent) and stabilizes in $O(\log{5/3} n)$ parallel time (i.e., $O(n\log{5/3} n)$ interactions) in expectation and with high probability. Alistarh et al. [SODA 2018] showed that any exact-majority protocol which stabilizes in expected $O(n{1-\epsilon})$ parallel time, for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, requires $\Omega(\log n)$ states. They also showed an $O(\log2 n)$-time protocol with $O(\log n)$ states, the currently fastest exact-majority protocol with polylogarithmic number of states. The standard design framework for majority protocols is based on $O(\log n)$ phases and requires that all nodes are well synchronized within each phase, leading naturally to upper bounds of the order of at least $\log2 n$ because of $\Theta(\log n)$ synchronization time per phase. We show how this framework can be tightened with {\em weak synchronization} to break the $O(\log2 n)$ upper bound of previous protocols.

Citations (22)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.