Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 104 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 156 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Facility Location with General Lower Bounds (1805.02244v1)

Published 6 May 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: In this paper, we give the first constant approximation algorithm for the lower bounded facility location (LBFL) problem with general lower bounds. Prior to our work, such algorithms were only known for the special case where all facilities have the same lower bound: Svitkina \cite{Svi10} gave a $448$-approximation for the special case, and subsequently Ahmadian and Swamy \cite{AS13} improved the approximation factor to 82.6. As in \cite{Svi10} and \cite{AS13}, our algorithm for LBFL with general lower bounds works by reducing the problem to the capacitated facility location (CFL) problem. To handle some challenges caused by the general lower bounds, our algorithm involves more reduction steps. One main complication is that after aggregation of clients and facilities at a few locations, each of these locations may contain many facilities with different opening costs and lower bounds. To handle this issue, we introduce and reduce our LBFL problem to an intermediate problem called the transportation with configurable supplies and demands (TCSD) problem, which in turn can be reduced to the CFL problem.

Citations (20)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)