Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 156 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 109 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 168 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A refined convergence analysis of pDCA$_e$ with applications to simultaneous sparse recovery and outlier detection (1804.07213v1)

Published 19 Apr 2018 in math.OC and stat.ML

Abstract: We consider the problem of minimizing a difference-of-convex (DC) function, which can be written as the sum of a smooth convex function with Lipschitz gradient, a proper closed convex function and a continuous possibly nonsmooth concave function. We refine the convergence analysis in [38] for the proximal DC algorithm with extrapolation (pDCA$_e$) and show that the whole sequence generated by the algorithm is convergent when the objective is level-bounded, {\em without} imposing differentiability assumptions in the concave part. Our analysis is based on a new potential function and we assume such a function is a Kurdyka-{\L}ojasiewicz (KL) function. We also establish a relationship between our KL assumption and the one used in [38]. Finally, we demonstrate how the pDCA$_e$ can be applied to a class of simultaneous sparse recovery and outlier detection problems arising from robust compressed sensing in signal processing and least trimmed squares regression in statistics. Specifically, we show that the objectives of these problems can be written as level-bounded DC functions whose concave parts are {\em typically nonsmooth}. Moreover, for a large class of loss functions and regularizers, the KL exponent of the corresponding potential function are shown to be 1/2, which implies that the pDCA$_e$ is locally linearly convergent when applied to these problems. Our numerical experiments show that the pDCA$_e$ usually outperforms the proximal DC algorithm with nonmonotone linesearch [24, Appendix A] in both CPU time and solution quality for this particular application.

Citations (32)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube