Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 31 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 9 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Optimal Document Exchange and New Codes for Insertions and Deletions (1804.03604v3)

Published 10 Apr 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: We give the first communication-optimal document exchange protocol. For any $n$ and $k < n$ our randomized scheme takes any $n$-bit file $F$ and computes a $\Theta(k \log \frac{n}{k})$-bit summary from which one can reconstruct $F$, with high probability, given a related file $F'$ with edit distance $ED(F,F') \leq k$. The size of our summary is information-theoretically order optimal for all values of $k$, giving a randomized solution to a longstanding open question of [Orlitsky; FOCS'91]. It also is the first non-trivial solution for the interesting setting where a small constant fraction of symbols have been edited, producing an optimal summary of size $O(H(\delta)n)$ for $k=\delta n$. This concludes a long series of better-and-better protocols which produce larger summaries for sub-linear values of $k$ and sub-polynomial failure probabilities. In particular, the recent break-through of [Belazzougui, Zhang; FOCS'16] assumes that $k < n\epsilon$, produces a summary of size $O(k\log2 k + k\log n)$, and succeeds with probability $1-(k \log n){-O(1)}$. We also give an efficient derandomized document exchange protocol with summary size $O(k \log2 \frac{n}{k})$. This improves, for any $k$, over a deterministic document exchange protocol by Belazzougui with summary size $O(k2 + k \log2 n)$. Our deterministic document exchange directly provides new efficient systematic error correcting codes for insertions and deletions. These (binary) codes correct any $\delta$ fraction of adversarial insertions/deletions while having a rate of $1 - O(\delta \log2 \frac{1}{\delta})$ and improve over the codes of Guruswami and Li and Haeupler, Shahrasbi and Vitercik which have rate $1 - \Theta\left(\sqrt{\delta} \log{O(1)} \frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$.

Citations (57)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)