Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Linear Programming Bounds for Randomly Sampling Colorings (1804.03156v2)

Published 9 Apr 2018 in cs.DS, cs.DM, math-ph, math.MP, and math.PR

Abstract: Here we study the problem of sampling random proper colorings of a bounded degree graph. Let $k$ be the number of colors and let $d$ be the maximum degree. In 1999, Vigoda showed that the Glauber dynamics is rapidly mixing for any $k > \frac{11}{6} d$. It turns out that there is a natural barrier at $\frac{11}{6}$, below which there is no one-step coupling that is contractive, even for the flip dynamics. We use linear programming and duality arguments to guide our construction of a better coupling. We fully characterize the obstructions to going beyond $\frac{11}{6}$. These examples turn out to be quite brittle, and even starting from one, they are likely to break apart before the flip dynamics changes the distance between two neighboring colorings. We use this intuition to design a variable length coupling that shows that the Glauber dynamics is rapidly mixing for any $k\ge \left(\frac{11}{6} - \epsilon_0\right)d$ where $\epsilon_0 \geq 9.4 \cdot 10{-5}$. This is the first improvement to Vigoda's analysis that holds for general graphs.

Citations (9)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)