Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sublinear-Time Quantum Computation of the Diameter in CONGEST Networks (1804.02917v3)

Published 9 Apr 2018 in cs.DC, cs.DS, and quant-ph

Abstract: The computation of the diameter is one of the most central problems in distributed computation. In the standard CONGEST model, in which two adjacent nodes can exchange $O(\log n)$ bits per round (here $n$ denotes the number of nodes of the network), it is known that exact computation of the diameter requires $\tilde \Omega(n)$ rounds, even in networks with constant diameter. In this paper we investigate quantum distributed algorithms for this problem in the quantum CONGEST model, where two adjacent nodes can exchange $O(\log n)$ quantum bits per round. Our main result is a $\tilde O(\sqrt{nD})$-round quantum distributed algorithm for exact diameter computation, where $D$ denotes the diameter. This shows a separation between the computational power of quantum and classical algorithms in the CONGEST model. We also show an unconditional lower bound $\tilde \Omega(\sqrt{n})$ on the round complexity of any quantum algorithm computing the diameter, and furthermore show a tight lower bound $\tilde \Omega(\sqrt{nD})$ for any distributed quantum algorithm in which each node can use only $\textrm{poly}(\log n)$ quantum bits of memory.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Quantum search of spatial regions. Theory of Computing, 1(1):47–79, 2005.
  2. Near-linear lower bounds for distributed distance computations, even in sparse networks. In Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2016), pages 29–42, 2016.
  3. Quantum vs. classical communication and computation. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 1998), pages 63–68, 1998.
  4. Charles H. Bennett. Time/space trade-offs for reversible computation. SIAM Journal on Computing, 18(4):766–776, 1989.
  5. Near-optimal bounds on bounded-round quantum communication complexity of disjointness. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2015), pages 773–791, 2015.
  6. Quantum counting. In Proceedings of the 25th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 1998), pages 820–831, 1998.
  7. A note on hardness of diameter approximation. In Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2017), pages 44:1–44:3, 2017.
  8. Can quantum mechanics help distributed computing? SIGACT News, 39(3):67–76, 2008.
  9. Quantum query complexity of some graph problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 35(6):1310–1328, 2006.
  10. Distributed quantum computing: a new frontier in distributed systems or science fiction? SIGACT News, 39(3):77–95, 2008.
  11. Can quantum communication speed up distributed computation? In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2014), pages 166–175, 2014.
  12. Networks cannot compute their diameter in sublinear time. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2012), pages 1150–1162, 2012.
  13. What can be observed locally? In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2009), pages 243–257, 2009.
  14. Improved quantum communication complexity bounds for disjointness and equality. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2002), pages 299–310, 2002.
  15. Distributed 3/2-approximation of the diameter. In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2014), pages 562–564, 2014.
  16. Optimal distributed all pairs shortest paths and applications. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2012), pages 355–364, 2012.
  17. A lower bound for the bounded round quantum communication complexity of set disjointness. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2003), pages 220–229, 2003.
  18. The probabilistic communication complexity of set intersection. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 5(4):545–557, 1992.
  19. François Le Gall. Exponential separation of quantum and classical online space complexity. Theory of Computing Systems, 45(2):188–202, 2009.
  20. Efficient distributed source detection with limited bandwidth. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2013), pages 375–382, 2013.
  21. Search via quantum walk. SIAM Journal on Computing, 40(1):142–164, 2011.
  22. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  23. Distributed algorithms for network diameter and girth. In Proceedings of the 39th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2012), pages 660–672, 2012.
  24. Alexander A. Razborov. On the distributional complexity of disjointness. Theoretical Computer Science, 106(2):385–390, 1992.
  25. Alexander A. Razborov. Quantum communication complexity of symmetric predicates. Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Science: Mathematics, 67(1):159–176, 2003.
  26. Exact quantum algorithms for the leader election problem. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory, 4(1):1:1–1:24, 2012.
  27. Ronald de Wolf. Quantum communication and complexity. Theoretical Computer Science, 287(1):337–353, 2002.
  28. Andrew C. Yao. Some complexity questions related to distributive computing (preliminary report). In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1979), pages 209–213, 1979.
  29. Andrew C. Yao. Quantum circuit complexity. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1993), pages 352–361, 1993.
Citations (37)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.