Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 194 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 106 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Optimal Data-based Kernel Estimation of Evolutionary Spectra (1803.03897v1)

Published 11 Mar 2018 in stat.ME, eess.AS, eess.IV, eess.SP, and physics.data-an

Abstract: Complex demodulation of evolutionary spectra is formulated as a two-dimensional kernel smoother in the time-frequency domain. In the first stage, a tapered Fourier transform, $y_{nu}(f,t)$, is calculated. Second, the log-spectral estimate, $\hat{\theta}{\nu}(f,t) \equiv \ln(|y{nu}(f,t)|2$, is smoothed. As the characteristic widths of the kernel smoother increase, the bias from temporal and frequency averaging increases while the variance decreases. The demodulation parameters, such as the order, length, and bandwidth of spectral taper and the kernel smoother, are determined by minimizing the expected error. For well-resolved evolutionary spectra, the optimal taper length is a small fraction of the optimal kernel half-width. The optimal frequency bandwidth, $w$, for the spectral window scales as $w2 \approx \lambda_F/ \tau $, where $\tau$ is the characteristic time, and $\lambda_F$ is the characteristic frequency scale-length. In contrast, the optimal half-widths for the second stage kernel smoother scales as $h \approx 1/(\tau \lambda_F){1 \over ( p+2) }$, where $p$ is the order of the kernel smoother. The ratio of the optimal frequency half-width to the optimal time half-width satisfies $h_F / h_T ~ (|\partial_t p \theta | / |\partial_fp \theta|)$. Since the expected loss depends on the unknown evolutionary spectra, we initially estimate $|\partial_tp \theta|2$ and $|\partial_fp \theta|2$ using a higher order kernel smoothers, and then substitute the estimated derivatives into the expected loss criteria.

Citations (40)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.