Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 177 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Lower Bounds on Sparse Spanners, Emulators, and Diameter-reducing shortcuts (1802.06271v2)

Published 17 Feb 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: We prove better lower bounds on additive spanners and emulators, which are lossy compression schemes for undirected graphs, as well as lower bounds on shortcut sets, which reduce the diameter of directed graphs. We show that any $O(n)$-size shortcut set cannot bring the diameter below $\Omega(n{1/6})$, and that any $O(m)$-size shortcut set cannot bring it below $\Omega(n{1/11})$. These improve Hesse's [Hesse03] lower bound of $\Omega(n{1/17})$. By combining these constructions with Abboud and Bodwin's [AbboudB17] edge-splitting technique, we get additive stretch lower bounds of $+\Omega(n{1/11})$ for $O(n)$-size spanners and $+\Omega(n{1/18})$ for $O(n)$-size emulators. These improve Abboud and Bodwin's $+\Omega(n{1/22})$ lower bounds.

Citations (31)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.