Emergent Mind

Abstract

We prove better lower bounds on additive spanners and emulators, which are lossy compression schemes for undirected graphs, as well as lower bounds on shortcut sets, which reduce the diameter of directed graphs. We show that any $O(n)$-size shortcut set cannot bring the diameter below $\Omega(n{1/6})$, and that any $O(m)$-size shortcut set cannot bring it below $\Omega(n{1/11})$. These improve Hesse's [Hesse03] lower bound of $\Omega(n{1/17})$. By combining these constructions with Abboud and Bodwin's [AbboudB17] edge-splitting technique, we get additive stretch lower bounds of $+\Omega(n{1/11})$ for $O(n)$-size spanners and $+\Omega(n{1/18})$ for $O(n)$-size emulators. These improve Abboud and Bodwin's $+\Omega(n{1/22})$ lower bounds.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.