Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Techniques for proving Asynchronous Convergence results for Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods (1711.06719v5)

Published 17 Nov 2017 in stat.ML, cs.LG, and stat.CO

Abstract: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods such as Gibbs sampling are finding widespread use in applied statistics and machine learning. These often lead to difficult computational problems, which are increasingly being solved on parallel and distributed systems such as compute clusters. Recent work has proposed running iterative algorithms such as gradient descent and MCMC in parallel asynchronously for increased performance, with good empirical results in certain problems. Unfortunately, for MCMC this parallelization technique requires new convergence theory, as it has been explicitly demonstrated to lead to divergence on some examples. Recent theory on Asynchronous Gibbs sampling describes why these algorithms can fail, and provides a way to alter them to make them converge. In this article, we describe how to apply this theory in a generic setting, to understand the asynchronous behavior of any MCMC algorithm, including those implemented using parameter servers, and those not based on Gibbs sampling.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.