Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Skyline Queries in O(1) time?

Published 12 Sep 2017 in cs.DB | (1709.03949v1)

Abstract: The skyline of a set PP of points (SKY(P)SKY(P)) consists of the "best" points with respect to minimization or maximization of the attribute values. A point pp dominates another point qq if pp is as good as qq in all dimensions and it is strictly better than qq in at least one dimension. In this work, we focus on the static $2$-d space and provide expected performance guarantees for $3$-sided Range Skyline Queries on the Grid, where NN is the cardinality of PP, BB the size of a disk block, and RR the capacity of main memory. We present the MLR-tree, which offers optimal expected cost for finding planar skyline points in a $3$-sided query rectangle, q=[a,b]×(−∞,d]q=[a,b]\times(-\infty,d], in both RAM and I/O model on the grid [1,M]×[1,M][1,M]\times [1,M], by single scanning only the points contained in SKY(P)SKY(P). In particular, it supports skyline queries in a $3$-sided range in O(t⋅tPAM(N))O(t\cdot t_{PAM}(N)) time (O((t/B)⋅tPAM(N))O((t/B)\cdot t_{PAM}(N)) I/Os), where tt is the answer size and tPAM(N)t_{PAM}(N) the time required for answering predecessor queries for dd in a PAM (Predecessor Access Method) structure, which is a special component of MLR-tree and stores efficiently root-to-leaf paths or sub-paths. By choosing PAM structures with O(1)O(1) expected time for predecessor queries under discrete μ\mu-random distributions of the xx and yy coordinates, MLR-tree supports skyline queries in optimal O(t)O(t) expected time (O(t/B)O(t/B) expected number of I/Os) with high probability. The space cost becomes superlinear and can be reduced to linear for many special practical cases. If we choose a PAM structure with O(1)O(1) amortized time for batched predecessor queries (under no assumption on distributions of the xx and yy coordinates), MLR-tree supports batched skyline queries in optimal O(t)O(t) amortized time, however the space becomes exponential. In dynamic case, the update time complexity is affected by a O(log<sup>2N)O(log<sup>{2}N) factor.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.