Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 427 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

New Tools and Connections for Exponential-time Approximation (1708.03515v1)

Published 11 Aug 2017 in cs.DS and cs.CC

Abstract: In this paper, we develop new tools and connections for exponential time approximation. In this setting, we are given a problem instance and a parameter $\alpha>1$, and the goal is to design an $\alpha$-approximation algorithm with the fastest possible running time. We show the following results: - An $r$-approximation for maximum independent set in $O*(\exp(\tilde O(n/r \log2 r+r\log2r)))$ time, - An $r$-approximation for chromatic number in $O*(\exp(\tilde{O}(n/r \log r+r\log2r)))$ time, - A $(2-1/r)$-approximation for minimum vertex cover in $O*(\exp(n/r{\Omega(r)}))$ time, and - A $(k-1/r)$-approximation for minimum $k$-hypergraph vertex cover in $O*(\exp(n/(kr){\Omega(kr)}))$ time. (Throughout, $\tilde O$ and $O*$ omit $\mathrm{polyloglog}(r)$ and factors polynomial in the input size, respectively.) The best known time bounds for all problems were $O*(2{n/r})$ [Bourgeois et al. 2009, 2011 & Cygan et al. 2008]. For maximum independent set and chromatic number, these bounds were complemented by $\exp(n{1-o(1)}/r{1+o(1)})$ lower bounds (under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH)) [Chalermsook et al., 2013 & Laekhanukit, 2014 (Ph.D. Thesis)]. Our results show that the naturally-looking $O*(2{n/r})$ bounds are not tight for all these problems. The key to these algorithmic results is a sparsification procedure, allowing the use of better approximation algorithms for bounded degree graphs. For obtaining the first two results, we introduce a new randomized branching rule. Finally, we show a connection between PCP parameters and exponential-time approximation algorithms. This connection together with our independent set algorithm refute the possibility to overly reduce the size of Chan's PCP [Chan, 2016]. It also implies that a (significant) improvement over our result will refute the gap-ETH conjecture [Dinur 2016 & Manurangsi and Raghavendra, 2016].

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube