Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

$ν$-net: Deep Learning for Generalized Biventricular Cardiac Mass and Function Parameters (1706.04397v1)

Published 14 Jun 2017 in cs.CV and stat.ML

Abstract: Background: Cardiac MRI derived biventricular mass and function parameters, such as end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), and ventricular mass (VM) are clinically well established. Image segmentation can be challenging and time-consuming, due to the complex anatomy of the human heart. Objectives: This study introduces $\nu$-net (/nju:n$\varepsilon$t/) -- a deep learning approach allowing for fully-automated high quality segmentation of right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) endocardium and epicardium for extraction of cardiac function parameters. Methods: A set consisting of 253 manually segmented cases has been used to train a deep neural network. Subsequently, the network has been evaluated on 4 different multicenter data sets with a total of over 1000 cases. Results: For LV EF the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is 98, 95, and 80 % (95 %), and for RV EF 96, and 87 % (80 %) on the respective data sets (human expert ICCs reported in parenthesis). The LV VM ICC is 95, and 94 % (84 %), and the RV VM ICC is 83, and 83 % (54 %). This study proposes a simple adjustment procedure, allowing for the adaptation to distinct segmentation philosophies. $\nu$-net exhibits state of-the-art performance in terms of dice coefficient. Conclusions: Biventricular mass and function parameters can be determined reliably in high quality by applying a deep neural network for cardiac MRI segmentation, especially in the anatomically complex right ventricle. Adaption to individual segmentation styles by applying a simple adjustment procedure is viable, allowing for the processing of novel data without time-consuming additional training.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Hinrich B Winther (1 paper)
  2. Christian Hundt (6 papers)
  3. Bertil Schmidt (10 papers)
  4. Christoph Czerner (1 paper)
  5. Johann Bauersachs (1 paper)
  6. Frank Wacker (6 papers)
  7. Jens Vogel-Claussen (2 papers)
Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.