Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Hitting minors on bounded treewidth graphs. I. General upper bounds

Published 24 Apr 2017 in cs.DS, cs.CC, and math.CO | (1704.07284v5)

Abstract: For a finite collection of graphs F{\cal F}, the F{\cal F}-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph GG and an integer kk, deciding whether there exists S⊆V(G)S \subseteq V(G) with ∣S∣≤k|S| \leq k such that G∖SG \setminus S does not contain any of the graphs in F{\cal F} as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of F{\cal F}-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of GG, denoted by twtw. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed F{\cal F}, the smallest function fFf_{{\cal F}} such that {F{\cal F}-M-DELETION can be solved in time fF(tw)⋅nO(1)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)} on nn-vertex graphs. We prove that fF(tw)=22O(tw⋅log⁡tw)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}} for every collection F{\cal F}, that fF(tw)=2O(tw⋅log⁡tw)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)} if F{\cal F} contains a planar graph, and that fF(tw)=2O(tw)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw)} if in addition the input graph GG is planar or embedded in a surface. We also consider the version of the problem where the graphs in F{\cal F} are forbidden as topological minors, called F{\cal F}-TM-DELETION. We prove similar results for this problem, except that in the last two algorithms, instead of requiring F{\cal F} to contain a planar graph, we need it to contain a subcubic planar graph. This is the first of a series of articles on this topic.

Citations (14)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.