Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 27 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 70 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 117 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 459 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Modeling Uncertainty and Evolving Self-Adaptive Software: A Fuzzy Theory Based Requirements Engineering Approach (1704.00873v1)

Published 4 Apr 2017 in cs.SE and cs.SY

Abstract: Self-adaptive software (SAS) is capable of adjusting its behavior in response to meaningful changes in the operational context and itself. Due to the inherent volatility of the open and changeable environment in which SAS is embedded, the ability of adaptation is highly demanded by many software-intensive systems. Two concerns, i.e., the requirements uncertainty and the context uncertainty are most important among others at Requirements Engineering (RE) stage. However, requirements analyzers can hardly figure out the mathematical relation between requirements, system behavior and context, especially for complex and nonlinear systems, due to the existence of above uncertainties, misunderstanding and ambiguity of prior knowledge. An essential issue to be addressed is how to model and specify these uncertainties at RE stage and how to utilize the prior knowledge to achieve adaptation. In this paper, we propose a fuzzy-based approach to modeling uncertainty and achieving evolution. The approach introduces specifications to describe fuzziness. Based on the specifications, we derive a series of reasoning rules as knowledge base for achieving adaptation and evolution. These two targets are implemented through four reasoning schemas from a control theory perspective. Specifically, forward reasoning schema is used for direct adaptation; backward reasoning schema is used for optimal adaptation. Parameter-identified schema implements learning evolution by considering SAS as the gray-box system, while system-identified reasoning schema implements learning evolution by considering SAS as the gray-box system. The former two schemas function as the control group, while the latter two are de-signed as the experimental groups to illustrate the learning ability. Our approach is implemented under three types of context through the demonstration of a mobile computing application.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.