Sample complexity of population recovery

The problem of population recovery refers to estimating a distribution based on incomplete or corrupted samples. Consider a random poll of sample size $n$ conducted on a population of individuals, where each pollee is asked to answer $d$ binary questions. We consider one of the two polling impediments: (a) in lossy population recovery, a pollee may skip each question with probability $\epsilon$, (b) in noisy population recovery, a pollee may lie on each question with probability $\epsilon$. Given $n$ lossy or noisy samples, the goal is to estimate the probabilities of all $2^d$ binary vectors simultaneously within accuracy $\delta$ with high probability. This paper settles the sample complexity of population recovery. For lossy model, the optimal sample complexity is $\tilde\Theta(\delta^{{-2\max{\frac{\epsilon}{1-\epsilon},1}})$,} improving the state of the art by Moitra and Saks in several ways: a lower bound is established, the upper bound is improved and the result depends at most on the logarithm of the dimension. Surprisingly, the sample complexity undergoes a phase transition from parametric to nonparametric rate when $\epsilon$ exceeds $1/2$. For noisy population recovery, the sharp sample complexity turns out to be more sensitive to dimension and scales as $\exp(\Theta(d^{1/3} \log^{{2/3}(1/\delta)))$} except for the trivial cases of $\epsilon=0,1/2$ or $1$. For both models, our estimators simply compute the empirical mean of a certain function, which is found by pre-solving a linear program (LP). Curiously, the dual LP can be understood as Le Cam's method for lower-bounding the minimax risk, thus establishing the statistical optimality of the proposed estimators. The value of the LP is determined by complex-analytic methods.