Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 133 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 125 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Vertical perimeter versus horizontal perimeter (1701.00620v2)

Published 3 Jan 2017 in math.MG, cs.DS, math.CA, math.CO, and math.FA

Abstract: The discrete Heisenberg group $\mathbb{H}{\mathbb{Z}}{2k+1}$ is the group generated by $a_1,b_1,\ldots,a_k,b_k,c$, subject to the relations $[a_1,b_1]=\ldots=[a_k,b_k]=c$ and $[a_i,a_j]=[b_i,b_j]=[a_i,b_j]=[a_i,c]=[b_i,c]=1$ for every distinct $i,j\in {1,\ldots,k}$. Denote $S={a_1{\pm 1},b_1{\pm 1},\ldots,a_k{\pm 1},b_k{\pm 1}}$. The horizontal boundary of $\Omega\subset \mathbb{H}{\mathbb{Z}}{2k+1}$, denoted $\partial_{h}\Omega$, is the set of all $(x,y)\in \Omega\times (\mathbb{H}{\mathbb{Z}}{2k+1}\setminus \Omega)$ such that $x{-1}y\in S$. The horizontal perimeter of $\Omega$ is $|\partial{h}\Omega|$. For $t\in \mathbb{N}$, define $\partialt_{v} \Omega$ to be the set of all $(x,y)\in \Omega\times (\mathbb{H}{\mathsf{Z}}{2k+1}\setminus \Omega)$ such that $x{-1}y\in {ct,c{-t}}$. The vertical perimeter of $\Omega$ is defined by $|\partial{v}\Omega|= \sqrt{\sum_{t=1}\infty |\partialt_{v}\Omega|2/t2}$. It is shown here that if $k\ge 2$, then $|\partial_{v}\Omega|\lesssim \frac{1}{k} |\partial_{h}\Omega|$. The proof of this "vertical versus horizontal isoperimetric inequality" uses a new structural result that decomposes sets of finite perimeter in the Heisenberg group into pieces that admit an "intrinsic corona decomposition." This allows one to deduce an endpoint $W{1,1}\to L_2(L_1)$ boundedness of a certain singular integral operator from a corresponding lower-dimensional $W{1,2}\to L_2(L_2)$ boundedness. The above inequality has several applications, including that any embedding into $L_1$ of a ball of radius $n$ in the word metric on $\mathbb{H}_{\mathbb{Z}}{5}$ incurs bi-Lipschitz distortion that is at least a constant multiple of $\sqrt{\log n}$. It follows that the integrality gap of the Goemans--Linial semidefinite program for the Sparsest Cut Problem on inputs of size $n$ is at least a constant multiple of $\sqrt{\log n}$.

Citations (62)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.