Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Sufficiently Myopic Adversaries are Blind

Published 5 Oct 2016 in cs.IT and math.IT | (1610.01287v1)

Abstract: In this work we consider a communication problem in which a sender, Alice, wishes to communicate with a receiver, Bob, over a channel controlled by an adversarial jammer, James, who is {\em myopic}. Roughly speaking, for blocklength nn, the codeword X<sup>nX<sup>n transmitted by Alice is corrupted by James who must base his adversarial decisions (of which locations of X<sup>nX<sup>n to corrupt and how to corrupt them) not on the codeword X<sup>nX<sup>n but on Z<sup>nZ<sup>n, an image of X<sup>nX<sup>n through a noisy memoryless channel. More specifically, our communication model may be described by two channels. A memoryless channel p(z∣x)p(z|x) from Alice to James, and an {\it Arbitrarily Varying Channel} from Alice to Bob, p(y∣x,s)p(y|x,s) governed by a state X<sup>nX<sup>n determined by James. In standard adversarial channels the states S<sup>nS<sup>n may depend on the codeword X<sup>nX<sup>n, but in our setting S<sup>nS<sup>n depends only on James's view Z<sup>nZ<sup>n. The myopic channel captures a broad range of channels and bridges between the standard models of memoryless and adversarial (zero-error) channels. In this work we present upper and lower bounds on the capacity of myopic channels. For a number of special cases of interest we show that our bounds are tight. We extend our results to the setting of {\em secure} communication in which we require that the transmitted message remain secret from James. For example, we show that if (i) James may flip at most a pp fraction of the bits communicated between Alice and Bob, and (ii) James views X<sup>nX<sup>n through a binary symmetric channel with parameter qq, then once James is "sufficiently myopic" (in this case, when $q&gt;p$), then the optimal communication rate is that of an adversary who is "blind" (that is, an adversary that does not see X<sup>nX<sup>n at all), which is $1-H(p)$ for standard communication, and H(q)−H(p)H(q)-H(p) for secure communication. A similar phenomenon exists for our general model of communication.

Citations (37)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.