Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Compressed sensing with corrupted Fourier measurements (1607.04926v2)

Published 18 Jul 2016 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: This paper studies a data recovery problem in compressed sensing (CS), given a measurement vector b with corruptions: b=Ax0+f0, can we recover x0 and f0 via the reweighted l1 minimization: minimize |x| + lambda*|f| subject to Ax+f=b? Here the m by n measurement matrix A is a partial Fourier matrix, x0 denotes the n dimensional ground true signal vector, f0 denotes the m-dimensional corrupted noise vector, it is assumed that a positive fraction of entries in the measurement vector b are corrupted by the non-zero entries of f0. This problem had been studied in literatures [1-3], unfortunately, certain random assumptions (which are often hard to meet in practice) are required for the signal x0 in these papers. In this paper, we show that x0 and f0 can be recovered exactly by the solution of the above reweighted l1 minimization with high probability provided that m>O(card(x0)log(n)log(n)) and n is prime, here card(x0) denotes the cardinality (number of non-zero entries) of x0. Except the sparsity, no extra assumption is needed for x0.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)