Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 156 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 110 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 436 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Discovering topically- and temporally-coherent events in interaction networks (1606.09446v2)

Published 30 Jun 2016 in cs.SI

Abstract: With the increasing use of online communication platforms, such as email, twitter, and messaging applications, we are faced with a growing amount of data that combine content (what is said), time (when), and user (by whom) information. An important computational challenge is to analyze these data, discover meaningful patterns, and understand what is happening. We consider the problem of mining online communication data and finding top-k temporal events. We define a temporal event to be a coherent topic that is discussed frequently, in a relatively short time span, while the information ow of the event respects the underlying network structure. We construct our model for detecting temporal events in two steps. We first introduce the notion of interaction meta-graph, which connects associated interactions. Using this notion, we define a temporal event to be a subset of interactions that (i) are topically and temporally close and (ii) correspond to a tree that captures the information ow. Finding the best temporal event leads to budget version of the prize-collecting Steiner-tree (PCST) problem, which we solve using three different methods: a greedy approach, a dynamic-programming algorithm, and an adaptation to an existing approximation algorithm. The problem of finding the top- k events among a set of candidate events maps to maximum set-cover problem, and thus, solved by greedy. We compare and analyze our algorithms in both synthetic and real datasets, such as twitter and email communication. The results show that our methods are able to detect meaningful temporal events.

Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.