Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Non-negativity constraints in the one-dimensional discrete-time phase retrieval problem (1605.05482v1)

Published 18 May 2016 in math.NA, cs.IT, and math.IT

Abstract: Phase retrieval problems occur in a width range of applications in physics and engineering such as crystallography, astronomy, and laser optics. Common to all of them is the recovery of an unknown signal from the intensity of its Fourier transform. Because of the well-known ambiguousness of these problems, the determination of the original signal is generally challenging. Although there are many approaches in the literature to incorporate the assumption of non-negativity of the solution into numerical algorithms, theoretical considerations about the solvability with this constraint occur rarely. In this paper, we consider the one-dimensional discrete-time setting and investigate whether the usually applied a priori non-negativity can overcame the ambiguousness of the phase retrieval problem or not. We show that the assumed non-negativity of the solution is usually not a sufficient a priori condition to ensure uniqueness in one-dimensional phase retrieval. More precisely, using an appropriate characterization of the occurring ambiguities, we show that neither the uniqueness nor the ambiguousness are rare exceptions.

Citations (18)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)