Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Geometric Dominating Set and Set Cover via Local Search (1605.02499v2)

Published 9 May 2016 in cs.CG

Abstract: In this paper, we study two classic optimization problems: minimum geometric dominating set and set cover. In the dominating-set problem, for a given set of objects in {the} plane as input, the objective is to choose a minimum number of input objects such that every input object is dominated by the chosen set of objects. Here, one object is dominated by {another} if both of them have {a} nonempty intersection region. For the second problem, for a given set of points and objects {in a plane}, the objective is to choose {a} minimum number of objects to cover all the points. This is a special version of the set-cover problem. For both problems obtaining a PTAS remains open for a large class of objects. For the dominating-set problem, we prove that {a} popular local-search algorithm leads to an $(1+\varepsilon)$ approximation for object sets consisting of homothetic set of convex objects (which includes arbitrary squares, $k$-regular polygons, translated and scaled copies of a convex set, etc.) in $n{O(1/\varepsilon2)}$ time. On the other hand, the same technique leads to a PTAS for geometric covering problem when the objects are convex pseudodisks (which includes disks, unit height rectangles, homothetic convex objects, etc.). As a consequence, we obtain an easy to implement approximation algorithm for both problems for a large class of objects, significantly improving the best known approximation guarantees.

Citations (5)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.