Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Convergence of Contrastive Divergence Algorithm in Exponential Family (1603.05729v3)

Published 17 Mar 2016 in stat.ML

Abstract: The Contrastive Divergence (CD) algorithm has achieved notable success in training energy-based models including Restricted Boltzmann Machines and played a key role in the emergence of deep learning. The idea of this algorithm is to approximate the intractable term in the exact gradient of the log-likelihood function by using short Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs. The approximate gradient is computationally-cheap but biased. Whether and why the CD algorithm provides an asymptotically consistent estimate are still open questions. This paper studies the asymptotic properties of the CD algorithm in canonical exponential families, which are special cases of the energy-based model. Suppose the CD algorithm runs $m$ MCMC transition steps at each iteration $t$ and iteratively generates a sequence of parameter estimates ${\theta_t}{t \ge 0}$ given an i.i.d. data sample ${X_i}{i=1}n \sim p_{\theta_\star}$. Under conditions which are commonly obeyed by the CD algorithm in practice, we prove the existence of some bounded $m$ such that any limit point of the time average $\left. \sum_{s=0}{t-1} \theta_s \right/ t$ as $t \to \infty$ is a consistent estimate for the true parameter $\theta_\star$. Our proof is based on the fact that ${\theta_t}{t \ge 0}$ is a homogenous Markov chain conditional on the data sample ${X_i}{i=1}n$. This chain meets the Foster-Lyapunov drift criterion and converges to a random walk around the Maximum Likelihood Estimate. The range of the random walk shrinks to zero at rate $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt[3]{n})$ as the sample size $n \to \infty$.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Bai Jiang (9 papers)
  2. Tung-Yu Wu (9 papers)
  3. Yifan Jin (12 papers)
  4. Wing H. Wong (7 papers)
Citations (11)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.