Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The inverse fast multipole method: using a fast approximate direct solver as a preconditioner for dense linear systems (1508.01835v2)

Published 7 Aug 2015 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: Although some preconditioners are available for solving dense linear systems, there are still many matrices for which preconditioners are lacking, in particular in cases where the size of the matrix $N$ becomes very large. There remains hence a great need to develop general purpose preconditioners whose cost scales well with the matrix size $N$. In this paper, we propose a preconditioner with broad applicability and with cost $\mathcal{O}(N)$ for dense matrices, when the matrix is given by a smooth kernel. Extending the method using the same framework to general $\mathcal{H}2$-matrices is relatively straightforward. These preconditioners have a controlled accuracy (machine accuracy can be achieved if needed) and scale linearly with $N$. They are based on an approximate direct solve of the system. The linear scaling of the algorithm is achieved by means of two key ideas. First, the $\mathcal{H}2$-structure of the dense matrix is exploited to obtain an extended sparse system of equations. Second, fill-ins arising when performing the elimination are compressed as low-rank matrices if they correspond to well-separated interactions. This ensures that the sparsity pattern of the extended sparse matrix is preserved throughout the elimination, hence resulting in a very efficient algorithm with $\mathcal{O}(N \log(1/\varepsilon)2 )$ computational cost and $\mathcal{O}(N \log 1/\varepsilon )$ memory requirement, for an error tolerance $0 < \varepsilon < 1$. The solver is inexact, although the error can be controlled and made as small as needed. These solvers are related to ILU in the sense that the fill-in is controlled. However, in ILU, most of the fill-in is simply discarded whereas here it is approximated using low-rank blocks, with a prescribed tolerance. Numerical examples are discussed to demonstrate the linear scaling of the method and to illustrate its effectiveness as a preconditioner.

Citations (66)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.