Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Algorithm for Solving Massively Underdefined Systems of Multivariate Quadratic Equations over Finite Fields (1507.03674v1)

Published 14 Jul 2015 in cs.CR and cs.SC

Abstract: Solving systems of m multivariate quadratic equations in n variables (MQ-problem) over finite fields is NP-hard. The security of many cryptographic systems is based on this problem. Up to now, the best algorithm for solving the underdefined MQ-problem is Hiroyuki Miura et al.'s algorithm, which is a polynomial-time algorithm when [n \ge m(m + 3)/2] and the characteristic of the field is even. In order to get a wider applicable range, we reduce the underdefined MQ-problem to the problem of finding square roots over finite field, and then combine with the guess and determine method. In this way, the applicable range is extended to [n \ge m(m + 1)/2], which is the widest range until now. Theory analysis indicates that the complexity of our algorithm is [O(q{n\omega }m{(\log {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} q)2}){\kern 1pt} ] when characteristic of the field is even and [O(q{2m}{n\omega }m{(\log {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} q)2})] when characteristic of the field is odd, where [2 \le \omega \le 3] is the complexity of Gaussian elimination.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)