Towards Better Separation between Deterministic and Randomized Query Complexity
(1506.06399)Abstract
We show that there exists a Boolean function $F$ which observes the following separations among deterministic query complexity $(D(F))$, randomized zero error query complexity $(R0(F))$ and randomized one-sided error query complexity $(R1(F))$: $R1(F) = \widetilde{O}(\sqrt{D(F)})$ and $R0(F)=\widetilde{O}(D(F)){3/4}$. This refutes the conjecture made by Saks and Wigderson that for any Boolean function $f$, $R0(f)=\Omega({D(f)}){0.753..}$. This also shows widest separation between $R1(f)$ and $D(f)$ for any Boolean function. The function $F$ was defined by G{\"{o}}{\"{o}}s, Pitassi and Watson who studied it for showing a separation between deterministic decision tree complexity and unambiguous non-deterministic decision tree complexity. Independently of us, Ambainis et al proved that different variants of the function $F$ certify optimal (quadratic) separation between $D(f)$ and $R0(f)$, and polynomial separation between $R0(f)$ and $R_1(f)$. Viewed as separation results, our results are subsumed by those of Ambainis et al. However, while the functions considerd in the work of Ambainis et al are different variants of $F$, we work with the original function $F$ itself.
We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.
Please check back later (sorry!).
Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:
We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.