Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The minimal measurement number for low-rank matrices recovery (1505.07204v1)

Published 27 May 2015 in math.NA, cs.IT, and math.IT

Abstract: The paper presents several results that address a fundamental question in low-rank matrices recovery: how many measurements are needed to recover low rank matrices? We begin by investigating the complex matrices case and show that $4nr-4r2$ generic measurements are both necessary and sufficient for the recovery of rank-$r$ matrices in $\C{n\times n}$ by algebraic tools. Thus, we confirm a conjecture which is raised by Eldar, Needell and Plan for the complex case. We next consider the real case and prove that the bound $4nr-4r2$ is tight provided $n=2k+r, k\in \Z_+$. Motivated by Vinzant's work, we construct $11$ matrices in $\R{4\times 4}$ by computer random search and prove they define injective measurements on rank-$1$ matrices in $\R{4\times 4}$. This disproves the conjecture raised by Eldar, Needell and Plan for the real case. Finally, we use the results in this paper to investigate the phase retrieval by projection and show fewer than $2n-1$ orthogonal projections are possible for the recovery of $x\in \Rn$ from the norm of them.

Citations (32)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)