Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 161 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Fast Network-Decomposition Algorithm and its Applications to Constant-Time Distributed Computation (1505.05697v2)

Published 21 May 2015 in cs.DC and cs.DS

Abstract: A partition $(C_1,C_2,...,C_q)$ of $G = (V,E)$ into clusters of strong (respectively, weak) diameter $d$, such that the supergraph obtained by contracting each $C_i$ is $\ell$-colorable is called a strong (resp., weak) $(d, \ell)$-network-decomposition. Network-decompositions were introduced in a seminal paper by Awerbuch, Goldberg, Luby and Plotkin in 1989. Awerbuch et al. showed that strong $(exp{O(\sqrt{ \log n \log \log n})}, exp{O(\sqrt{ \log n \log \log n})})$-network-decompositions can be computed in distributed deterministic time $exp{O(\sqrt{ \log n \log \log n})}$. The result of Awerbuch et al. was improved by Panconesi and Srinivasan in 1992: in the latter result $d = \ell = exp{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$, and the running time is $exp{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$ as well. Much more recently Barenboim (2012) devised a distributed randomized constant-time algorithm for computing strong network decompositions with $d = O(1)$. However, the parameter $\ell$ in his result is $O(n{1/2 + \epsilon})$. In this paper we drastically improve the result of Barenboim and devise a distributed randomized constant-time algorithm for computing strong $(O(1), O(n{\epsilon}))$-network-decompositions. As a corollary we derive a constant-time randomized $O(n{\epsilon})$-approximation algorithm for the distributed minimum coloring problem, improving the previously best-known $O(n{1/2 + \epsilon})$ approximation guarantee. We also derive other improved distributed algorithms for a variety of problems. Most notably, for the extremely well-studied distributed minimum dominating set problem currently there is no known deterministic polylogarithmic-time algorithm. We devise a {deterministic} polylogarithmic-time approximation algorithm for this problem, addressing an open problem of Lenzen and Wattenhofer (2010).

Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.