Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 30 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 184 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Subexponential Size Hitting Sets for Bounded Depth Multilinear Formulas (1411.7492v1)

Published 27 Nov 2014 in cs.CC

Abstract: In this paper we give subexponential size hitting sets for bounded depth multilinear arithmetic formulas. Using the known relation between black-box PIT and lower bounds we obtain lower bounds for these models. For depth-3 multilinear formulas, of size $\exp(n\delta)$, we give a hitting set of size $\exp(\tilde{O}(n{2/3 + 2\delta/3}))$. This implies a lower bound of $\exp(\tilde{\Omega}(n{1/2}))$ for depth-3 multilinear formulas, for some explicit polynomial. For depth-4 multilinear formulas, of size $\exp(n\delta)$, we give a hitting set of size $\exp(\tilde{O}(n{2/3 + 4\delta/3}))$. This implies a lower bound of $\exp(\tilde{\Omega}(n{1/4}))$ for depth-4 multilinear formulas, for some explicit polynomial. A regular formula consists of alternating layers of $+,\times$ gates, where all gates at layer $i$ have the same fan-in. We give a hitting set of size (roughly) $\exp\left(n{1- \delta} \right)$, for regular depth-$d$ multilinear formulas of size $\exp(n\delta)$, where $\delta = O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}d})$. This result implies a lower bound of roughly $\exp(\tilde{\Omega}(n{\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}d}}))$ for such formulas. We note that better lower bounds are known for these models, but also that none of these bounds was achieved via construction of a hitting set. Moreover, no lower bound that implies such PIT results, even in the white-box model, is currently known. Our results are combinatorial in nature and rely on reducing the underlying formula, first to a depth-4 formula, and then to a read-once algebraic branching program (from depth-3 formulas we go straight to read-once algebraic branching programs).

Citations (21)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube