Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 64 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Graph sharing game and the structure of weighted graphs with a forbidden subdivision (1411.6727v3)

Published 25 Nov 2014 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract: In the graph sharing game, two players share a connected graph $G$ with non-negative weights assigned to the vertices, claiming and collecting the vertices of $G$ one by one, while keeping the set of all claimed vertices connected through the whole game. Each player wants to maximize the total weight of the vertices they have gathered by the end of the game, when the whole $G$ has been claimed. It is proved that for any class $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs with an odd number of vertices and with forbidden subdivision of a fixed graph (e.g., for the class $\mathcal{G}$ of planar graphs with an odd number of vertices), there is a constant $c_{\mathcal{G}}>0$ such that the first player can secure at least the $c_{\mathcal{G}}$ proportion of the total weight of $G$ whenever $G\in\mathcal{G}$. Known examples show that such a constant does no longer exist if any of the two conditions on the class $\mathcal{G}$ (an odd number of vertices or a forbidden subdivision) is removed. The main ingredient in the proof is a new structural result on weighted graphs with a forbidden subdivision.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.