Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

k-Metric Antidimension: a Privacy Measure for Social Graphs (1408.2154v2)

Published 9 Aug 2014 in math.CO and cs.DB

Abstract: Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple connected graph and $S = {w_1, \cdots, w_t} \subseteq V$ an ordered subset of vertices. The metric representation of a vertex $u\in V$ with respect to $S$ is the $t$-vector $r(u|S) = (d_G(u, w_1), \cdots, d_G(u, w_t))$, where $d_G(u, v)$ represents the length of a shortest $u-v$ path in $G$. The set $S$ is called a resolving set for $G$ if $r(u|S) = r(v|S)$ implies $u = v$ for every $u, v \in V$. The smallest cardinality of a resolving set is the metric dimension of $G$. In this article we propose, to the best of our knowledge, a new problem in Graph Theory that resembles to the aforementioned metric dimension problem. We call $S$ a $k$-antiresolving set if $k$ is the largest positive integer such that for every vertex $v \in V-S$ there exist other $k-1$ different vertices $v_1, \cdots, v_{k-1} \in V-S$ with $r(v|S) = r(v_1|S) = \cdots = r(v_{k-1}|S)$, \emph{i.e.}, $v$ and $v_1, \cdots, v_{k-1}$ have the same metric representation with respect to $S$. The $k$-metric antidimension of $G$ is the minimum cardinality among all the $k$-antiresolving sets for $G$. In this article, we introduce a novel privacy measure, named $(k, \ell)$-anonymity and based on the $k$-metric antidimension problem, aimed at evaluating the resistance of social graphs to active attacks. We, therefore, propose a true-biased algorithm for computing the $k$-metric antidimension of random graphs. The success rate of our algorithm, according to empirical results, is above $80 \%$ and $90 \%$ when looking for a $k$-antiresolving basis and a $k$-antiresolving set respectively. We also investigate theoretical properties of the $k$-antiresolving sets and the $k$-metric antidimension of graphs. In particular, we focus on paths, cycles, complete bipartite graphs and trees.

Citations (47)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube