Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 159 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Extra Gain:Improved Sparse Channel Estimation Using Reweighted l_1-norm Penalized LMS/F Algorithm (1407.6078v1)

Published 23 Jul 2014 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: The channel estimation is one of important techniques to ensure reliable broadband signal transmission. Broadband channels are often modeled as a sparse channel. Comparing with traditional dense-assumption based linear channel estimation methods, e.g., least mean square/fourth (LMS/F) algorithm, exploiting sparse structure information can get extra performance gain. By introducing l_1-norm penalty, two sparse LMS/F algorithms, (zero-attracting LMSF, ZA-LMS/F and reweighted ZA-LMSF, RZA-LMSF), have been proposed [1]. Motivated by existing reweighted l_1-norm (RL1) sparse algorithm in compressive sensing [2], we propose an improved channel estimation method using RL1 sparse penalized LMS/F (RL1-LMS/F) algorithm to exploit more efficient sparse structure information. First, updating equation of RL1-LMS/F is derived. Second, we compare their sparse penalize strength via figure example. Finally, computer simulation results are given to validate the superiority of proposed method over than conventional two methods.

Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.