Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

SURE Information Criteria for Large Covariance Matrix Estimation and Their Asymptotic Properties (1406.6514v3)

Published 25 Jun 2014 in math.ST, cs.IT, math.IT, and stat.TH

Abstract: Consider $n$ independent and identically distributed $p$-dimensional Gaussian random vectors with covariance matrix $\Sigma.$ The problem of estimating $\Sigma$ when $p$ is much larger than $n$ has received a lot of attention in recent years. Yet little is known about the information criterion for covariance matrix estimation. How to properly define such a criterion and what are the statistical properties? We attempt to answer these questions in the present paper by focusing on the estimation of bandable covariance matrices when $p>n$ but $\log(p)=o(n)$. Motivated by the deep connection between Stein's unbiased risk estimation (SURE) and AIC in regression models, we propose a family of generalized SURE ($\text{SURE}c$) indexed by $c$ for covariance matrix estimation, where $c$ is some constant. When $c$ is 2, $\text{SURE}_2$ provides an unbiased estimator of the Frobenious risk of the covariance matrix estimator. Furthermore, we show that by minimizing $\text{SURE}_2$ over all possible banding covariance matrix estimators we attain the minimax optimal rate of convergence and the resulting estimator behaves like the covariance matrix estimator obtained by the so-called oracle tuning. On the other hand, we also show that $\text{SURE}_2$ is selection inconsistent when the true covariance matrix is exactly banded. To fix the selection inconsistency, we consider using SURE with $c=\log(n)$ and prove that by minimizing $\text{SURE}{\log(n)}$ we select the true bandwith with probability tending to one. Therefore, our analysis indicates that $\text{SURE}2$ and $\text{SURE}{\log(n)}$ can be regarded as the AIC and BIC for large covariance matrix estimation, respectively.

Citations (11)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)