Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Solving Multi-choice Secretary Problem in Parallel: An Optimal Observation-Selection Protocol

Published 23 May 2014 in cs.DS, cs.CC, and cs.GT | (1405.5975v2)

Abstract: The classical secretary problem investigates the question of how to hire the best secretary from nn candidates who come in a uniformly random order. In this work we investigate a parallel generalizations of this problem introduced by Feldman and Tennenholtz [14]. We call it shared QQ-queue JJ-choice KK-best secretary problem. In this problem, nn candidates are evenly distributed into QQ queues, and instead of hiring the best one, the employer wants to hire JJ candidates among the best KK persons. The JJ quotas are shared by all queues. This problem is a generalized version of JJ-choice KK-best problem which has been extensively studied and it has more practical value as it characterizes the parallel situation. Although a few of works have been done about this generalization, to the best of our knowledge, no optimal deterministic protocol was known with general QQ queues. In this paper, we provide an optimal deterministic protocol for this problem. The protocol is in the same style of the 1e1\over e-solution for the classical secretary problem, but with multiple phases and adaptive criteria. Our protocol is very simple and efficient, and we show that several generalizations, such as the fractional JJ-choice KK-best secretary problem and exclusive QQ-queue JJ-choice KK-best secretary problem, can be solved optimally by this protocol with slight modification and the latter one solves an open problem of Feldman and Tennenholtz [14]. In addition, we provide theoretical analysis for two typical cases, including the 1-queue 1-choice KK-best problem and the shared 2-queue 2-choice 2-best problem. For the former, we prove a lower bound 1O(ln<sup>2KK<sup>2)1-O(\frac{\ln<sup>2K}{K<sup>2}) of the competitive ratio. For the latter, we show the optimal competitive ratio is 0.372\approx0.372 while previously the best known result is 0.356 [14].

Authors (3)
Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.