Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Local Algorithms for Sparse Spanning Graphs

Published 14 Feb 2014 in cs.DS | (1402.3609v3)

Abstract: Constructing a spanning tree of a graph is one of the most basic tasks in graph theory. We consider a relaxed version of this problem in the setting of local algorithms. The relaxation is that the constructed subgraph is a sparse spanning subgraph containing at most (1+ϵ)n(1+\epsilon)n edges (where nn is the number of vertices and ϵ\epsilon is a given approximation/sparsity parameter). In the local setting, the goal is to quickly determine whether a given edge ee belongs to such a subgraph, without constructing the whole subgraph, but rather by inspecting (querying) the local neighborhood of ee. The challenge is to maintain consistency. That is, to provide answers concerning different edges according to the same spanning subgraph. We first show that for general bounded-degree graphs, the query complexity of any such algorithm must be Ω(n)\Omega(\sqrt{n}). This lower bound holds for constant-degree graphs that have high expansion. Next we design an algorithm for (bounded-degree) graphs with high expansion, obtaining a result that roughly matches the lower bound. We then turn to study graphs that exclude a fixed minor (and are hence non-expanding). We design an algorithm for such graphs, which may have an unbounded maximum degree. The query complexity of this algorithm is poly(1/ϵ,h)poly(1/\epsilon, h) (independent of nn and the maximum degree), where hh is the number of vertices in the excluded minor. Though our two algorithms are designed for very different types of graphs (and have very different complexities), on a high-level there are several similarities, and we highlight both the similarities and the differences.

Authors (3)
Citations (34)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.