Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A tight lower bound instance for k-means++ in constant dimension

Published 13 Jan 2014 in cs.DS | (1401.2912v2)

Abstract: The k-means++ seeding algorithm is one of the most popular algorithms that is used for finding the initial kk centers when using the k-means heuristic. The algorithm is a simple sampling procedure and can be described as follows: Pick the first center randomly from the given points. For $i &gt; 1$, pick a point to be the i<sup>thi<sup>{th} center with probability proportional to the square of the Euclidean distance of this point to the closest previously (i−1)(i-1) chosen centers. The k-means++ seeding algorithm is not only simple and fast but also gives an O(log⁡k)O(\log{k}) approximation in expectation as shown by Arthur and Vassilvitskii. There are datasets on which this seeding algorithm gives an approximation factor of Ω(log⁡k)\Omega(\log{k}) in expectation. However, it is not clear from these results if the algorithm achieves good approximation factor with reasonably high probability (say $1/poly(k)$). Brunsch and R\"{o}glin gave a dataset where the k-means++ seeding algorithm achieves an O(log⁡k)O(\log{k}) approximation ratio with probability that is exponentially small in kk. However, this and all other known lower-bound examples are high dimensional. So, an open problem was to understand the behavior of the algorithm on low dimensional datasets. In this work, we give a simple two dimensional dataset on which the seeding algorithm achieves an O(log⁡k)O(\log{k}) approximation ratio with probability exponentially small in kk. This solves open problems posed by Mahajan et al. and by Brunsch and R\"{o}glin.

Citations (10)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.