Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Secrecy Capacity Scaling in Large Cooperative Wireless Networks (1312.3198v2)

Published 11 Dec 2013 in cs.IT, cs.CR, and math.IT

Abstract: We investigate large wireless networks subject to security constraints. In contrast to point-to-point, interference-limited communications considered in prior works, we propose active cooperative relaying based schemes. We consider a network with $n_l$ legitimate nodes, $n_e$ eavesdroppers, and path loss exponent $\alpha\geq 2$. As long as $n_e2(\log(n_e)){\gamma}=o(n_l)$, for some positive $\gamma$, we show one can obtain unbounded secure aggregate rate. This means zero-cost secure communication, given fixed total power constraint for the entire network. We achieve this result through (i) the source using Wyner randomized encoder and a serial (multi-stage) block Markov scheme, to cooperate with the relays and (ii) the relays acting as a virtual multi-antenna to apply beamforming against the eavesdroppers. Our simpler parallel (two-stage) relaying scheme can achieve the same unbounded secure aggregate rate when $n_e{\frac{\alpha}{2}+1}(\log(n_e)){\gamma+\delta(\frac{\alpha}{2}+1)}=o(n_l)$ holds, for some positive $\gamma,\delta$. Finally, we study the improvement (to the detriment of legitimate nodes) the eavesdroppers achieve in terms of the information leakage rate in a large cooperative network in case of collusion. We show that again the zero-cost secure communication is possible, if $n_e{(2+\frac{2}{\alpha})}(\log n_e){\gamma}=o(n_l)$ holds, for some positive $\gamma$; i.e., in case of collusion slightly fewer eavesdroppers can be tolerated compared to the non-colluding case.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.