Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficiently Computing Edit Distance to Dyck Language (1311.2557v2)

Published 11 Nov 2013 in cs.DS and cs.FL

Abstract: Given a string $\sigma$ over alphabet $\Sigma$ and a grammar $G$ defined over the same alphabet, how many minimum number of repairs: insertions, deletions and substitutions are required to map $\sigma$ into a valid member of $G$ ? We investigate this basic question in this paper for $Dyck(s)$. $Dyck(s)$ is a fundamental context free grammar representing the language of well-balanced parentheses with s different types of parentheses and has played a pivotal role in the development of theory of context free languages. Computing edit distance to $Dyck(s)$ significantly generalizes string edit distance problem and has numerous applications ranging from repairing semi-structured documents such as XML to memory checking, automated compiler optimization, natural language processing etc. In this paper we give the first near-linear time algorithm for edit distance computation to $Dyck(s)$ that achieves a nontrivial approximation factor of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log{OPT}(\log{n}){\frac{1}{\epsilon}})$ in $O(n{1+\epsilon}\log{n})$ time. In fact, given there exists an algorithm for computing string edit distance on input of size $n$ in $\alpha(n)$ time with $\beta(n)$-approximation factor, we can devise an algorithm for edit distance problem to $Dyck(s)$ running in $\tilde{O}(n{1+\epsilon}+\alpha(n))$ and achieving an approximation factor of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\beta(n)\log{OPT})$. We show that the framework for efficiently approximating edit distance to $Dyck(s)$ can be applied to many other languages. We illustrate this by considering various memory checking languages which comprise of valid transcripts of stacks, queues, priority queues, double-ended queues etc. Therefore, any language that can be recognized by these data structures, can also be repaired efficiently by our algorithm.

Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)