Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A bad 2-dimensional instance for k-means++

Published 18 Jun 2013 in cs.DS | (1306.4207v1)

Abstract: The k-means++ seeding algorithm is one of the most popular algorithms that is used for finding the initial kk centers when using the k-means heuristic. The algorithm is a simple sampling procedure and can be described as follows: {quote} Pick the first center randomly from among the given points. For $i &gt; 1$, pick a point to be the i<sup>thi<sup>{th} center with probability proportional to the square of the Euclidean distance of this point to the previously (i−1)(i-1) chosen centers. {quote} The k-means++ seeding algorithm is not only simple and fast but gives an O(log⁡k)O(\log{k}) approximation in expectation as shown by Arthur and Vassilvitskii \cite{av07}. There are datasets \cite{av07,adk09} on which this seeding algorithm gives an approximation factor Ω(log⁡k)\Omega(\log{k}) in expectation. However, it is not clear from these results if the algorithm achieves good approximation factor with reasonably large probability (say $1/poly(k)$). Brunsch and R\"{o}glin \cite{br11} gave a dataset where the k-means++ seeding algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of (2/3−ϵ)⋅log⁡k(2/3 - \epsilon)\cdot \log{k} only with probability that is exponentially small in kk. However, this and all other known {\em lower-bound examples} \cite{av07,adk09} are high dimensional. So, an open problem is to understand the behavior of the algorithm on low dimensional datasets. In this work, we give a simple two dimensional dataset on which the seeding algorithm achieves an approximation ratio cc (for some universal constant cc) only with probability exponentially small in kk. This is the first step towards solving open problems posed by Mahajan et al \cite{mnv12} and by Brunsch and R\"{o}glin \cite{br11}.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.