Parameterizations of Test Cover with Bounded Test Sizes (1209.6528v2)

Abstract: In the {\sc Test Cover} problem we are given a hypergraph $H=(V, \mathcal{E})$ with $|V|=n, |\mathcal{E}|=m$, and we assume that $\mathcal{E}$ is a test cover, i.e. for every pair of vertices $x_i, x_j$, there exists an edge $e \in \mathcal{E}$ such that $|{x_i,x_j}\cap e|=1$. The objective is to find a minimum subset of $\mathcal{E}$ which is a test cover. The problem is used for identification across many areas, and is NP-complete. From a parameterized complexity standpoint, many natural parameterizations of {\sc Test Cover} are either $W[1]$-complete or have no polynomial kernel unless $coNP\subseteq NP/poly$, and thus are unlikely to be solveable efficiently. However, in practice the size of the edges is often bounded. In this paper we study the parameterized complexity of {\sc Test-$r$-Cover}, the restriction of {\sc Test Cover} in which each edge contains at most $r \ge 2$ vertices. In contrast to the unbounded case, we show that the following below-bound parameterizations of {\sc Test-$r$-Cover} are fixed-parameter tractable with a polynomial kernel: (1) Decide whether there exists a test cover of size $n-k$, and (2) decide whether there exists a test cover of size $m-k$, where $k$ is the parameter. In addition, we prove a new lower bound $\lceil \frac{2(n-1)}{r+1} \rceil$ on the minimum size of a test cover when the size of each edge is bounded by $r$. {\sc Test-$r$-Cover} parameterized above this bound is unlikely to be fixed-parameter tractable; in fact, we show that it is para-NP-complete, as it is NP-hard to decide whether an instance of {\sc Test-$r$-Cover} has a test cover of size exactly $\frac{2(n-1)}{r+1}$.