Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Convex Integer Optimization by Constantly Many Linear Counterparts (1208.5639v1)

Published 28 Aug 2012 in math.CO, cs.DM, cs.DS, and math.OC

Abstract: In this article we study convex integer maximization problems with composite objective functions of the form $f(Wx)$, where $f$ is a convex function on $\Rd$ and $W$ is a $d\times n$ matrix with small or binary entries, over finite sets $S\subset \Zn$ of integer points presented by an oracle or by linear inequalities. Continuing the line of research advanced by Uri Rothblum and his colleagues on edge-directions, we introduce here the notion of {\em edge complexity} of $S$, and use it to establish polynomial and constant upper bounds on the number of vertices of the projection $\conv(WS)$ and on the number of linear optimization counterparts needed to solve the above convex problem. Two typical consequences are the following. First, for any $d$, there is a constant $m(d)$ such that the maximum number of vertices of the projection of any matroid $S\subset{0,1}n$ by any binary $d\times n$ matrix $W$ is $m(d)$ regardless of $n$ and $S$; and the convex matroid problem reduces to $m(d)$ greedily solvable linear counterparts. In particular, $m(2)=8$. Second, for any $d,l,m$, there is a constant $t(d;l,m)$ such that the maximum number of vertices of the projection of any three-index $l\times m\times n$ transportation polytope for any $n$ by any binary $d\times(l\times m\times n)$ matrix $W$ is $t(d;l,m)$; and the convex three-index transportation problem reduces to $t(d;l,m)$ linear counterparts solvable in polynomial time.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.