Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 34 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 80 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 461 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On distributed monitoring of asynchronous systems (1208.2125v1)

Published 10 Aug 2012 in cs.FL and cs.LO

Abstract: Distributed systems are notoriously difficult to understand and analyze in order to assert their correction w.r.t. given properties. They often exhibit a huge number of different behaviors, as soon as the active entities (peers, agents, processes, etc) behave in an asynchronous manner. Already the modelization of such systems is a non-trivial task, let alone their formal verification. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the problem of distributed monitoring on a simple model of finite-state distributed automata based on shared actions, called asynchronous automata. Monitoring is a question related to runtime verification: assume that we have to check a property $L$ against an unknown or very complex system $A$, so that classical static analysis is not possible. Therefore instead of model-checking a monitor is used, that checks the property on the underlying system at runtime. We are interested here in monitoring distributed systems modeled as asynchronous automata. It is natural to require that monitors should be of the same kind as the underlying system, so we consider here distributed monitoring. A distributed monitor does not have a global view of the system, therefore we propose the notion of locally monitorable trace language. Our main result shows that if the distributed alphabet of actions is connected and if $L$ is a set of infinite traces such that both $L$ and its complement $Lc$ are countable unions of locally safety languages, then $L$ is locally monitorable. We also show that over infinite traces, recognizable countable unions of locally safety languages are precisely the complements of deterministic languages.

Citations (11)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.