Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Hierarchical Performance Modeling for Ranking Dense Linear Algebra Algorithms (1207.5217v3)

Published 22 Jul 2012 in cs.PF

Abstract: A large class of dense linear algebra operations, such as LU decomposition or inversion of a triangular matrix, are usually performed by blocked algorithms. For one such operation, typically, not only one but many algorithmic variants exist; depending on computing architecture, libraries and problem size, each variant attains a different performances. We propose methods and tools to rank the algorithmic variants according to their performance for a given scenario without executing them. For this purpose, we identify the routines upon which the algorithms are built. A first tool - the Sampler - measures the performance of these routines. Using the Sampler, a second tool models their performance. The generated models are then used to predict the performance of the considered algorithms. For a given scenario, these predictions allow us to correctly rank the algorithms according to their performance without executing them. With the help of the same tools, algorithmic parameters such as block-size can be optimally tuned.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)