Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Černy conjecture (1202.4626v11)

Published 21 Feb 2012 in cs.DM

Abstract: A word $w$ of letters on edges of underlying graph $\Gamma$ of deterministic finite automaton (DFA) is called synchronizing if $w$ sends all states of the automaton to a unique state. J. \v{C}erny discovered in 1964 a sequence of $n$-state complete DFA possessing a minimal synchronizing word of length $(n-1)2$. The hypothesis, well known today as the \v{C}erny conjecture, claims that it is also precise upper bound on the length of such a word for a complete DFA. The hypothesis was formulated in 1966 by Starke. The problem has motivated great and constantly growing number of investigations and generalizations. To prove the conjecture, we use algebra w on a special class of row monomial matrices (one unit and rest zeros in every row), induced by words in the alphabet of labels on edges. These matrices generate a space with respect to the mentioned operation. The proof is based on connection between length of words $u$ and dimension of the space generated by solutions $L_x$ of matrix equation $M_uL_x=M_s$ for synchronizing word $s$, as well as on the relation between ranks of $M_u$ and $L_x$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)