Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Algebraic Independence in Positive Characteristic -- A p-Adic Calculus (1202.4301v1)

Published 20 Feb 2012 in cs.CC and math.AC

Abstract: A set of multivariate polynomials, over a field of zero or large characteristic, can be tested for algebraic independence by the well-known Jacobian criterion. For fields of other characteristic p>0, there is no analogous characterization known. In this paper we give the first such criterion. Essentially, it boils down to a non-degeneracy condition on a lift of the Jacobian polynomial over (an unramified extension of) the ring of p-adic integers. Our proof builds on the de Rham-Witt complex, which was invented by Illusie (1979) for crystalline cohomology computations, and we deduce a natural generalization of the Jacobian. This new avatar we call the Witt-Jacobian. In essence, we show how to faithfully differentiate polynomials over F_p (i.e. somehow avoid dxp/dx=0) and thus capture algebraic independence. We apply the new criterion to put the problem of testing algebraic independence in the complexity class NP#P (previously best was PSPACE). Also, we give a modest application to the problem of identity testing in algebraic complexity theory.

Citations (13)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.