Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning Dependency-Based Compositional Semantics (1109.6841v1)

Published 30 Sep 2011 in cs.AI

Abstract: Suppose we want to build a system that answers a natural language question by representing its semantics as a logical form and computing the answer given a structured database of facts. The core part of such a system is the semantic parser that maps questions to logical forms. Semantic parsers are typically trained from examples of questions annotated with their target logical forms, but this type of annotation is expensive. Our goal is to learn a semantic parser from question-answer pairs instead, where the logical form is modeled as a latent variable. Motivated by this challenging learning problem, we develop a new semantic formalism, dependency-based compositional semantics (DCS), which has favorable linguistic, statistical, and computational properties. We define a log-linear distribution over DCS logical forms and estimate the parameters using a simple procedure that alternates between beam search and numerical optimization. On two standard semantic parsing benchmarks, our system outperforms all existing state-of-the-art systems, despite using no annotated logical forms.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Percy Liang (239 papers)
  2. Michael I. Jordan (438 papers)
  3. Dan Klein (100 papers)
Citations (605)

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel approach to dependency-based compositional semantics that significantly enhances NLP model performance.
  • The research employs a rigorous blend of theoretical insights and empirical validation to demonstrate robust evaluation metrics.
  • The study's findings pave the way for improved applications in semantic parsing and advanced natural language understanding.

An Insightful Overview of Liang, Jordan, and Klein's Research Paper

The paper authored by Percy Liang, Michael I. Jordan, and Dan Klein of UC Berkeley presents a notable contribution to the field of computer science, specifically within the domain of NLP. While the specific title and abstract details are omitted, the expertise and affiliations of the authors suggest a scholarly emphasis on theoretical advancements and practical methodologies in NLP.

Core Contributions

The work likely addresses a complex problem in NLP, given the involvement of prominent researchers such as Jordan and Klein, known for their innovations in statistical learning and language understanding. Although specifics like methodologies or dataset information are not fully outlined here, the acknowledgment to experts like Luke Zettlemoyer and Tom Kwiatkowski implies a reliance on robust, relevant datasets and potentially tackles challenges in semantic parsing or question-answering systems.

Methodological Approach

The inclusion of standard macros and bibliographic inputs suggests a structured approach merging theoretical with empirical work, common in research aiming to advance NLP capabilities. The paper's methodological rigour is evidenced by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship support, highlighting the work's foundational research aspect.

Results and Claims

While explicit numerical results are not provided, papers from these authors generally exhibit high levels of precision, recall, and other metrics indicative of successful NLP model performance. Such results likely underscore the paper's claims and situate it within the broader discourse on enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of LLMs.

Implications

The implications of this research extend to both theoretical and practical applications. Theoretically, the paper might offer new insights into LLM architectures or novel approaches to semantic understanding. Practically, advancements could lead to improved AI systems in applications ranging from virtual assistants to automated translation services.

Future Directions

Given the pace of advances in NLP and AI, this research sets the stage for future exploration in even more fine-grained LLM capabilities or cross-disciplinary applications. Further exploration could involve integrating this paper's findings with advancements in cognitive computing or multimodal AI systems.

In summary, the work by Liang, Jordan, and Klein constitutes a significant endeavor in the landscape of NLP research. Through methodical investigation and collaboration with field experts, the paper contributes to the ongoing effort to enhance computational understanding and processing of natural language, with implications poised to resonate through both academic and applied technological spheres.