Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 31 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 9 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Robustness of a Tree-like Network of Interdependent Networks (1108.5515v1)

Published 29 Aug 2011 in physics.data-an, cs.SI, and physics.soc-ph

Abstract: In reality, many real-world networks interact with and depend on other networks. We develop an analytical framework for studying interacting networks and present an exact percolation law for a network of $n$ interdependent networks (NON). We present a general framework to study the dynamics of the cascading failures process at each step caused by an initial failure occurring in the NON system. We study and compare both $n$ coupled Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi (ER) graphs and $n$ coupled random regular (RR) graphs. We found recently [Gao et. al. arXive:1010.5829] that for an NON composed of $n$ ER networks each of average degree $k$, the giant component, $P_{\infty}$, is given by $P_{\infty}=p[1-\exp(-kP_{\infty})]n$ where $1-p$ is the initial fraction of removed nodes. Our general result coincides for $n=1$ with the known Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi second-order phase transition at a threshold, $p=p_c$, for a single network. For $n=2$ the general result for $P_{\infty}$ corresponds to the $n=2$ result [Buldyrev et. al., Nature, 464, (2010)]. Similar to the ER NON, for $n=1$ the percolation transition at $p_c$, is of second order while for any $n>1$ it is of first order. The first order percolation transition in both ER and RR (for $n>1$) is accompanied by cascading failures between the networks due to their interdependencies. However, we find that the robustness of $n$ coupled RR networks of degree $k$ is dramatically higher compared to the $n$ coupled ER networks of average degree $k$. While for ER NON there exists a critical minimum average degree $k=k_{\min}$, that increases with $n$, below which the system collapses, there is no such analogous $k_{\min}$ for RR NON system.

Citations (14)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube