Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Counting Perfect Matchings as Fast as Ryser (1107.4466v2)

Published 22 Jul 2011 in cs.DS

Abstract: We show that there is a polynomial space algorithm that counts the number of perfect matchings in an $n$-vertex graph in $O*(2{n/2})\subset O(1.415n)$ time. ($O*(f(n))$ suppresses functions polylogarithmic in $f(n)$).The previously fastest algorithms for the problem was the exponential space $O*(((1+\sqrt{5})/2)n) \subset O(1.619n)$ time algorithm by Koivisto, and for polynomial space, the $O(1.942n)$ time algorithm by Nederlof. Our new algorithm's runtime matches up to polynomial factors that of Ryser's 1963 algorithm for bipartite graphs. We present our algorithm in the more general setting of computing the hafnian over an arbitrary ring, analogously to Ryser's algorithm for permanent computation. We also give a simple argument why the general exact set cover counting problem over a slightly superpolynomial sized family of subsets of an $n$ element ground set cannot be solved in $O*(2{(1-\epsilon_1)n})$ time for any $\epsilon_1>0$ unless there are $O*(2{(1-\epsilon_2)n})$ time algorithms for computing an $n\times n$ 0/1 matrix permanent, for some $\epsilon_2>0$ depending only on $\epsilon_1$.

Citations (42)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)