Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

ANSIG - An Analytic Signature for Arbitrary 2D Shapes (or Bags of Unlabeled Points) (1010.4021v1)

Published 19 Oct 2010 in cs.CV

Abstract: In image analysis, many tasks require representing two-dimensional (2D) shape, often specified by a set of 2D points, for comparison purposes. The challenge of the representation is that it must not only capture the characteristics of the shape but also be invariant to relevant transformations. Invariance to geometric transformations, such as translation, rotation, and scale, has received attention in the past, usually under the assumption that the points are previously labeled, i.e., that the shape is characterized by an ordered set of landmarks. However, in many practical scenarios, the points describing the shape are obtained from automatic processes, e.g., edge or corner detection, thus without labels or natural ordering. Obviously, the combinatorial problem of computing the correspondences between the points of two shapes in the presence of the aforementioned geometrical distortions becomes a quagmire when the number of points is large. We circumvent this problem by representing shapes in a way that is invariant to the permutation of the landmarks, i.e., we represent bags of unlabeled 2D points. Within our framework, a shape is mapped to an analytic function on the complex plane, leading to what we call its analytic signature (ANSIG). To store an ANSIG, it suffices to sample it along a closed contour in the complex plane. We show that the ANSIG is a maximal invariant with respect to the permutation group, i.e., that different shapes have different ANSIGs and shapes that differ by a permutation (or re-labeling) of the landmarks have the same ANSIG. We further show how easy it is to factor out geometric transformations when comparing shapes using the ANSIG representation. Finally, we illustrate these capabilities with shape-based image classification experiments.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.