Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Nonstandard linear recurring sequence subgroups in finite fields and automorphisms of cyclic codes

Published 3 Jul 2008 in cs.IT, cs.DM, math.CO, and math.IT | (0807.0595v1)

Abstract: Let q=p<sup>rq=p<sup>r be a prime power, and let $f(x)=x<sup>m-\gs_{m-1}x<sup>{m-1}-</sup></sup> &gt;...-\gs_1x-\gs_0$ be an irreducible polynomial over the finite field $\GF(q)$ of size qq. A zero ξ\xi of ff is called {\em nonstandard (of degree mm) over $\GF(q)$} if the recurrence relation $u_m=\gs_{m-1}u_{m-1} + ... + \gs_1u_1+\gs_0u_0$ with characteristic polynomial ff can generate the powers of ξ\xi in a nontrivial way, that is, with u0=1u_0=1 and f(u1)≠0f(u_1)\neq 0. In 2003, Brison and Nogueira asked for a characterisation of all nonstandard cases in the case m=2m=2, and solved this problem for qq a prime, and later for q=p<sup>rq=p<sup>r with r≤4r\leq4. In this paper, we first show that classifying nonstandard finite field elements is equivalent to classifying those cyclic codes over $\GF(q)$ generated by a single zero that posses extra permutation automorphisms. Apart from two sporadic examples of degree 11 over $\GF(2)$ and of degree 5 over $\GF(3)$, related to the Golay codes, there exist two classes of examples of nonstandard finite field elements. One of these classes (type I) involves irreducible polynomials ff of the form f(x)=x<sup>m−f0f(x)=x<sup>m-f_0, and is well-understood. The other class (type II) can be obtained from a primitive element in some subfield by a process that we call extension and lifting. We will use the known classification of the subgroups of $\PGL(2,q)$ in combination with a recent result by Brison and Nogueira to show that a nonstandard element of degree two over $\GF(q)$ necessarily is of type I or type II, thus solving completely the classification problem for the case m=2m=2.

Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.