Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Heavy-Tailed Limits for Medium Size Jobs and Comparison Scheduling (0805.1968v1)

Published 14 May 2008 in cs.PF and cs.NI

Abstract: We study the conditional sojourn time distributions of processor sharing (PS), foreground background processor sharing (FBPS) and shortest remaining processing time first (SRPT) scheduling disciplines on an event where the job size of a customer arriving in stationarity is smaller than exactly k>=0 out of the preceding m>=k arrivals. Then, conditioning on the preceding event, the sojourn time distribution of this newly arriving customer behaves asymptotically the same as if the customer were served in isolation with a server of rate (1-\rho)/(k+1) for PS/FBPS, and (1-\rho) for SRPT, respectively, where \rho is the traffic intensity. Hence, the introduced notion of conditional limits allows us to distinguish the asymptotic performance of the studied schedulers by showing that SRPT exhibits considerably better asymptotic behavior for relatively smaller jobs than PS/FBPS. Inspired by the preceding results, we propose an approximation to the SRPT discipline based on a novel adaptive job grouping mechanism that uses relative size comparison of a newly arriving job to the preceding m arrivals. Specifically, if the newly arriving job is smaller than k and larger than m-k of the previous m jobs, it is routed into class k. Then, the classes of smaller jobs are served with higher priorities using the static priority scheduling. The good performance of this mechanism, even for a small number of classes m+1, is demonstrated using the asymptotic queueing analysis under the heavy-tailed job requirements. We also discuss refinements of the comparison grouping mechanism that improve the accuracy of job classification at the expense of a small additional complexity.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.